<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>PhotoLegal&#187; Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/category/articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photolegal.com</link>
	<description>A UK podcast about Photography and the Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 10:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.4" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>Each fortnight, wildlife photographer Darren Hector of Canid and hobby photographer Phill Price join James Barisic of Everys Solicitors to discuss photography and the law.  In addition to regular topical updates, the trio cover topics such as copyright, e-commerce and police treatment of photographers.  They will be joined by guests from the world of photography, journalism and elsewhere and will also be answering listener questions.  What more could you ask for?</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>PhotoLegal</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.photolegal.com/images/itunesLogo.jpg" />
	<copyright>Copyright 2009, James Barisic, Darren Hector and Phill Price. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>A UK podcast about Photography and the Law</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>legal,photography,uk,law</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Arts">
		<itunes:category text="Visual Arts" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Business" />
	<itunes:category text="Games &amp; Hobbies">
		<itunes:category text="Hobbies" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>The Data Protection Act versus photography</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/11/22/the-data-protection-act-versus-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/11/22/the-data-protection-act-versus-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Dave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JISC Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps naively I hadn’t thought about the implication of the DPA upon photography before... The DPA was written in the infancy of the internet. Today there are more implications of revealing personal information.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/11/22/the-data-protection-act-versus-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An unhealthy society?</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/18/an-unhealthy-society/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/18/an-unhealthy-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Stevenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Randall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographing children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shahid Malik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How have we allowed ourselves to become so narrow minded to make an embarrassed grandfather feel obliged to delete his innocently taken photos fearing he has been labelled a predatory paedophile?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/18/an-unhealthy-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographers&#8217; rights campaigners back Journalist candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/02/photographers-rights-campaigners-back-journalist-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/02/photographers-rights-campaigners-back-journalist-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Simcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Journalist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo and video journalists behind a groundbreaking campaign for photographers' rights have declared their support for a journalist seeking one of the most scrutinised jobs in the British and Irish media.

Richard Simcox is one of eight candidates in an election to find a new editor of the National Union of Journalists' own magazine, the Journalist. He is currently the Editor of PCS Activate magazine.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/10/02/photographers-rights-campaigners-back-journalist-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill of Rights now allows a Competition Winners Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/28/bill-of-rights-now-allows-a-competition-winners-archive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/28/bill-of-rights-now-allows-a-competition-winners-archive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Harrison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bill of Rights (BoR) for Photography Competitions was developed by Pro-Imaging in the last months of 2007 and launched in March 2008. It was created as a set of conditions by which to judge the terms and conditions for photography competitions. Specifically those terms and conditions that defined the rights the entrant was to grant the organizer with respect to the entrant's images.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/28/bill-of-rights-now-allows-a-competition-winners-archive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PhotoLegal presenters witness unlawful stop and search</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/23/photolegal-presenters-witness-unlawful-stop-and-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/23/photolegal-presenters-witness-unlawful-stop-and-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Hector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PhotoLegal presenters Darren Hector and Phill Price today witnessed what they believed to be an unlawful stop and search in Trafalgar Square by two Police Community Support Officers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/23/photolegal-presenters-witness-unlawful-stop-and-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can happen when nobody knows the rules</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/11/what-can-happen-when-nobody-knows-the-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/11/what-can-happen-when-nobody-knows-the-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c2c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigel harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railway photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s becoming clear that senior railway managers know that enthusiasts should be able to take photos of rolling stock and of stations, but for whatever reason some staff on the ground are not hearing the message, or are choosing not to listen]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/09/11/what-can-happen-when-nobody-knows-the-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you have nothing to hide, you have everything to fear</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/28/if-you-have-nothing-to-hide-you-have-everything-to-fear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/28/if-you-have-nothing-to-hide-you-have-everything-to-fear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil refinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen white]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laws are created to hold those that misbehave in society to account, whilst at the same time protecting both them and society from any abuse of the same laws by those on the ground. Most of us are not fully aware of our rights and as ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the law...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/28/if-you-have-nothing-to-hide-you-have-everything-to-fear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post: Climate Camp &#8211; Met Police Charm Offensive &#8211; Will it work?</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/21/climate-camp-met-police-charm-offensive-will-it-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/21/climate-camp-met-police-charm-offensive-will-it-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Vallée</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what is it going to be like to document the Climate Camp next week?

My colleague Paul Lewis – who I have worked with on investigations into police surveillance of protesters and journalists, covert state targeting of environmental activists and police violence – has written an interesting article about how the Metropolitan Police are “overhauling its tactics for policing protests by reaching out to activists”. The Public Order Branch of the Met – C011 – has even set up a Twitter account!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/21/climate-camp-met-police-charm-offensive-will-it-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post: We need to get our own house in order too</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/10/guest-post-we-need-to-get-our-own-house-in-order-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/10/guest-post-we-need-to-get-our-own-house-in-order-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railway photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest contributor Chris W is a keen railway photographer.  In this post for PhotoLegal, he explains that while confrontations between enthusiasts and railway staff are on the increase, photographers need to check their own behaviour too.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/10/guest-post-we-need-to-get-our-own-house-in-order-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Birds can&#8217;t count! The Wildlife &amp; Countryside Act 1981</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/07/birds-cant-count-the-wca-act-1981/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/07/birds-cant-count-the-wca-act-1981/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Hector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don't become a wildlife photographer to get rich or famous.  There are far easier ways to to do both than spending your days crawling through guano (which is outnumbered by, and far preferable to, the days you have to spend behind a desk).  No, the reason you become a wildlife photographer is to spend at least some of your days in the company of other species, preferably in their natural habitat.  It therefore goes without saying that the most important thing to any wildlife photographer worth their salt is not the image they're about to take, it's the welfare of the animal they are fortunate enough to be spending time with.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/07/birds-cant-count-the-wca-act-1981/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest post: I&#8217;m a Photographer, Not a Terrorist! &#8211; A new campaign for photographers rights</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/03/guest-post-im-a-photographer-not-a-terrorist-a-new-campaign-for-photographers-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/03/guest-post-im-a-photographer-not-a-terrorist-a-new-campaign-for-photographers-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Warren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm a Photographer Not a Terrorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S44]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop and Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a guest post for PhotoLegal, freelance news photographer Jonathan Warren talks about the new campaign being launched to fight back against the use of terrorism legislation against photographers and the abuse by the police of stop &#38; search powers simply because people are taking photographs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/08/03/guest-post-im-a-photographer-not-a-terrorist-a-new-campaign-for-photographers-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court rules on fair use</title>
		<link>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/04/27/us-supreme-court-rules-on-fair-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/04/27/us-supreme-court-rules-on-fair-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Hector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photolegal.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was really interested to read of a US designer who was threatened by for using discarded chocolate bar wrappers in her art.

There are interesting questions for photographers which we could usefully discuss on the show.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.photolegal.com/index.php/2009/04/27/us-supreme-court-rules-on-fair-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
